3Studio
Environment setup and directory-level agents work out of the box, bringing AI down into an engineer’s daily operations: design, verification, flow and operations, fully governed and auditable.
From commercial space into industrial design and manufacturing
The model keeps learning in real industry and gets more accurate with use.
Design-simulation iteration cycle · joint trials in the satellite domain
Design → simulation → manufacturing
Structural / thermal / fluid / EM / electronics / control
Programs slip and tests fail because the design-verification cycle is the constraint, not compute. In the physical world a general large model is jagged: its world model is too coarse, like approximating a real field on a crude mesh. It only sharpens round by round on feedback from real simulation and measurement.
One round of model → simulate → redesign, with a separate toolset for structural, thermal, fluid and EM, and a human wiring them together.
The judgment behind a program lives in a handful of chief engineers and walks out with them; the next program starts over.
A general large model is fixed at delivery. It does not get more accurate because it is used on this satellite or this engine.
Why now: international capital and domestic policy point the same way at the same moment — pushing AI from chat into the design and manufacture of physical systems. Industrial agents are now a national task with a numeric target, and landing them takes a local version that can get onto the floor.
A desktop agent, a team platform, and the vertical model foundation — one base, three ways into the engineering floor.
Environment setup and directory-level agents work out of the box, bringing AI down into an engineer’s daily operations: design, verification, flow and operations, fully governed and auditable.
Treat agents as colleagues: assign work, track progress, raise blockers. People and agents share one board, organizational experience accumulates daily, and the knowledge base stays in sync with the desktop.
Three model lines: structure generation, multiphysics simulation surrogates, and planning-and-solving. Deployable on-premise, with training data never leaving the customer environment.
The three model lines emit executable structures and solver results, not prose. Every improvement has to clear physical ground truth: simulation and measurement, plus the optimality bound a solver proves for itself. Stages run across, multiphysics disciplines run down, unified on one foundation.
Manufacturing is a later phase
CAD/CAE toolchain in place: MATLAB / Simulink · STK · Ansys · Creo · HyperMesh · Nastran, extensible to third-party tools over MCP.
Governance built in: tool allow-list · full-chain audit · one-click rollback · tiered approval (human-in-the-loop).
Continual learning goes into the model, not into the prompt: seconds to adapt at inference, days to consolidate memory, months to train weights against simulation, measurement and solver optimality bounds.
The reuse curve is the core metric of this route — for each new physics domain, how many simulation samples fine-tuning saves over training from scratch. (Capability evolves with deployment.)
Adapts while reasoning, learning this specific program as it runs.
Memory settles and hardens, carries across sessions, stays auditable and reversible.
Simulation, measurement and optimality bounds act as reward, training the weights themselves.
General-capability regression past a threshold blocks the update; an improvement without ground truth to judge it does not count.
We advance along the same CAE toolchain, and the physical ground truth gets harder the further we go. One foundation, from design through to production, with every step driven by real demand.
Five engineering scenarios: systems, control, structural, mechanics and thermal, and MBSE.
Coupled multiphysics simulation with intelligent sampling compresses the design-simulation cycle to days; chief-engineer know-how settles into structured memory.
The hardest physical ground truth, a verifiable evaluation protocol, and cross-discipline toolchain orchestration.
Multiple ignitions, deep thrust variation, electric-propulsion thermal design.
Surrogate models over coupled structural, thermal, fluid and EM behaviour, with intelligent sampling to call the high-fidelity solver less.
The second and third physics domains, and the first data points on the reuse curve.
Manufacturability checks, process simulation, and the production impact of design changes.
Quality escapes traced back to the design; planning-and-solving takes over scheduling and dispatch.
Aerospace-grade design and verification capability, handed to the manufacturing supply base.
Others stop at the language and knowledge layer. We go into the compute layer and emit executable structures and solver results, with CAE and EDA tools as the engines we orchestrate underneath.
Three things stack up that are ours alone: a physical ground-truth data pipeline, a verifiable evaluation protocol, and access to the floor. The team combines large-model training, EDA commercialization and aerospace program engineering.
Along the ground-truth chain from design verification into manufacturing — each new physics domain makes the reuse curve cheaper. Deep on the capability axis, wide on the industry axis.
High-end manufacturing teams are welcome to reach out — we work closely with you on requirements and delivery.